A Case Report on Pain and Functional Recovery in a Post-Stroke Shoulder Pain Patient Treated with Korean medicine Centered on Acupotomy

Article information

J Korean Med. 2025;46(3):168-181
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 September 1
doi : https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.25042
1Department of Korean Medicine, The 8th Maneuver Division
2Korean Medical Society of Acupotomology, Seoul
3Department of Korean Medicine, Bareun-Jisung Korean Medicine Hospital
4Department of Internal Korean Medicine, Dong-Shin Korean Medicine Hospital
5Department of Internal Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University WISE Campus, Gyeongju-si
6Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Oriental Hospital, Goyang-si
Correspondence to: Mikyung Kim, Dongguk University Ilsan Oriental Hospital, 27, Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Tel: +82-31-961-9045, FAX: +82-31-961-9009, E-mail: 01mkkim@gmail.com
§

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received 2025 June 18; Revised 2025 July 24; Accepted 2025 August 12.

Abstract

Background

Post-stroke shoulder pain (PSSP) is a common complication that impedes upper limb function and quality of life. This case report describes the clinical outcome of Korean Medicine (KM) treatment centered on acupotomy in a patient unresponsive to conventional therapies.

Case Presentation

A 67-year-old woman developed severe right shoulder pain and upper limb dysfunction following a left basal ganglia infarction. PSSP was attributed to repetitive load-bearing during walker-assisted ambulation. Conservative treatments including acupuncture, electroacupuncture, cupping, and physical therapy were ineffective. She underwent 17 outpatient sessions over 60 days with KM centered on acupotomy. Acupotomy was performed at sites of muscle tension and tenderness (10–30 mm depth). Acupuncture was applied to bilateral LI4, LI11, TE5, ST36, GB34, LR3, and tender points in the right deltoid. Electroacupuncture (3 Hz, 10 minutes) was applied to the deltoid, and cupping was also administered.

Results

The patient exhibited marked clinical improvements: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score decreased from 10 to 3, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score improved from 121 to 28. Quality of life (QoL) also improved: EuroQoL-5 Dimension Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) increased from 30 to 80, and Stroke-Specific QoL score rose from 135 to 178. No serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

KM centered on acupotomy, even without conventional rehabilitation, may be an effective therapeutic strategy for subacute PSSP unresponsive to standard care. Further controlled trials are warranted to validate its efficacy and mechanisms.

Fig. 1

Brain MRI

Fig. 2

Timeline of treatments and evaluations

Fig. 3

Acupotomyused in this study (0.6 mm diameter, 50 mm length)

Fig. 4

Marked insertion sites for acupotomy(A) lateral decubitus position, used for deltoid, levatorscapulae, and posterior cervical muscles (B) supine position, used for medial epicondylar region.

Fig. 5

Progression of Quality of life(SS-QoL, EQ-5D VAS) with treatment

Fig. 6

Progression of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with treatment

Fig. 7

Progression of Shoulder Pain and Disability (SPADI) scores with treatment

Changes in Quality of Life (SS-QoL, EQ-5D VAS) and Pain (NRS, SPADI) Scores over the 60-Day Treatment Period

References

1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. 2018;Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392(10159):1789–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7.
2. Atalan P., Bērziņa G., Sunnerhagen K. S.. 2021;Influence of mobility restrictions on post-stroke pain. Brain Behav 11(5):e02092. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2092.
3. Lindgren I., Jönsson A. C., Norrving B., Lindgren A.. 2007;Shoulder pain after stroke: a prospective population-based study. Stroke 38(2):343–347. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000254598.16739.4e.
4. Edwards N. C., Ferro C. J., Townend J. N.. 2024;Heart disease and stroke statistics 2023 update from the American Heart Association-implications for nephrology. Nephrol Dial Transplant 39(3):387–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfad194.
5. Winstein C. J., Stein J., Arena R., Bates B., Cherney L. R., Cramer S. C., et al. 2016;Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 47(6):e98–e169. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.
6. Harrison R. A., Field T. S.. 2015;Post stroke pain: identification, assessment, and therapy. Cerebrovasc Dis 39(3–4):190–201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000375397.
7. Lee H. J., Lim Y. C., Lee Y. S., Kwon S. W., Lee Y. J., Ha I. H.. 2022;Analysis of medical service utilization for post-stroke sequelae in Korea between 2016 and 2018: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 12(1):20501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24710-8.
8. Kwon C. Y., Yoon S. H., Lee B. R.. 2019;Clinical effectiveness and safety of acupotomy: An overview of systematic reviews. Complement Ther Clin Pract 36:142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.07.002.
9. Hu R., Pan J. K., Li J. H., Zhang H., Li S. R., Zhang Y.. 2024;Effects of Acupotomy on Immobilization-Induced Gastrocnemius Contracture and Fibrosis in Rats via Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling. Chin J Integr Med 30(7):633–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-023-3553-z.
10. Chae H., Chu H., Lee J., Kim H., Kim D., Park S., et al. 2023;Effectiveness and Safety of Acupotomy Treatment on Shoulder Pain: 25 Multicenter Retrospective Study. J Pain Res 16:1367–1380. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S398711.
11. Park J.. 2016;Movement Disorders Following Cerebrovascular Lesion in the Basal Ganglia Circuit. Journal of movement disorders 9(2):71–79. https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.16005.
12. Farrar J. T., Pritchett Y. L., Robinson M., Prakash A., Chappell A.. 2010;The Clinical Importance of Changes in the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale for Worst, Least, and Average Pain Intensity: analyses of Data from Clinical Trials of Duloxetine in Pain Disorders. J Pain 11(2):109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.007.
13. Angst F., Schwyzer H. K., Aeschlimann A., Simmen B. R., Goldhahn J.. 2011;Measures of adult shoulder function: disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Its Short Version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society Standardized Shoulder. Arthritis Care Res 63(S11):S174–S188. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20630.
14. EuroQol Group. 1990;EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
15. Williams L. S., Weinberger M., Harris L. E., Clark D. O., Biller J.. 1999;Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 30(7):1362–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.
16. Banks J. L., Marotta C. A.. 2007;Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke 38(3):1091–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6.
17. Park J. W., Song Y., Keum D. H., Park S. H.. 2025;Survey of Korean Medicine Doctors’ Practices in Treating Shoulder Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare (Basel) 13(13):1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13131482.
18. Frandsen J. J., Quinlan N. J., Smith K. M., Lu C. C., Chalmers P. N., Tashjian R. Z.. 2022;Symptomatic Rotator Cuff Tear Progression: Conservatively Treated Full- and Partial-Thickness Tears Continue to Progress. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 4(3):e1091–e1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.006.
19. Cotellessa F., Campanella W., Puce L., May M. C., Ponzano M., Picasso R., et al. 2025;Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluation of Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain in Stroke Patients: A Longitudinal Observational Study Starting in the First Hours After Stroke. Medicina (Kaunas), 61(3):484. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030484.
20. Yoon S. H., Kim Y. S., Jo H. G., Kwon C. Y.. 2019;Current Usage of Terminologies Related to Acupotomy: a Literature Research and Standardization Suggestion. Chin J Integr Med 25(2):147–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-018-3015-1.
21. Lyle M. A., Nichols T. R.. 2019;Evaluating intermuscular Golgi tendon organ feedback with twitch contractions. The Journal of physiology 597(17):4627–4642. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP277363.
22. You J., Yang F., Liu N., Tang N., Fang T., Liu F., et al. 2019;Acupotomy Therapy for Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 132019;:2010816. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2010816.
23. Roosink M., Renzenbrink G. J., Buitenweg J. R., van Dongen R. T., Geurts A. C., Ijzerman M. J.. 2011;Somatosensory symptoms and signs and conditioned pain modulation in chronic post-stroke shoulder pain. The journal of pain 12(4):476–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.10.009.
24. Crichton S. L., Bray B. D., McKevitt C., Rudd A. G., Wolfe C. D. A.. 2016;Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87(10):1091–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2016-313361.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Brain MRI

Fig. 2

Timeline of treatments and evaluations

Fig. 3

Acupotomyused in this study (0.6 mm diameter, 50 mm length)

Fig. 4

Marked insertion sites for acupotomy(A) lateral decubitus position, used for deltoid, levatorscapulae, and posterior cervical muscles (B) supine position, used for medial epicondylar region.

Fig. 5

Progression of Quality of life(SS-QoL, EQ-5D VAS) with treatment

Fig. 6

Progression of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with treatment

Fig. 7

Progression of Shoulder Pain and Disability (SPADI) scores with treatment

Table 1

Changes in Quality of Life (SS-QoL, EQ-5D VAS) and Pain (NRS, SPADI) Scores over the 60-Day Treatment Period

*Session (Day) **SS-QoL EQ-5D VAS NRS §SPADI – Pain SPADI–Disability SPADI–Total
1 (Day 40) 135 30 10 43 78 121
5 (Day 57) 50 8 32 51 83
9 (Day 71) 154 60 5 23 36 59
13 (Day 85) 70 5 22 33 55
17 (Day 99) 178 80 3 12 16 28
*

Each session refers to an Traditional Korean medicine treatment including acupotomy.

**

SS-QoL: Stroke-Specific Quality of Life.

EQ-5D VAS: EuroQol-5 Dimension Visual Analogue Scale.

NRS: Numeric Rating Scale for shoulder pain.

§

SPADI: Shoulder Pain and Disability Index