A comparative study on enhanced anti-inflammatory activity of Cannabis root extract prepared by combined processing process

Article information

J Korean Med. 2024;45(2):41-54
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 June 01
doi : https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.24023
1Department of Diagnostics, College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University
2Institute of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University
3TOPO Lab., Co., Ltd.
4The Korean Cannabis Industry Association
Correspondence to: Dong-Woo Lim, Department of Diagnostics, College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University, Dongguk-Ro 32, Goyang 10326, Republic of Korea, Institute of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University, Dongguk-Ro 32, Goyang 10326, Goyang, Republic of Korea, TOPO Lab., Co., Ltd., Dongguk University, Dongguk-Ro 32, Goyang 10326, Goyang, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-31-961-5833, Fax: +82-31-961-5835, Email: greatwoodong@dongguk.edu
Received 2024 April 15; Revised 2024 May 1; Accepted 2024 May 7.

Abstract

Objectives

Cannabis root is a medicinal plant that has been used in traditional medicine around the world. However, in previous studies using simple extracts, the biological activity was not relatively prominent compared to other herbal medicines. The aim of the present study is to confirm the enhancement of anti-inflammatory activity and bioactive compound of Cannabis root extract prepared by combined processing process.

Methods

A series of processes including repeated steam and dry, fermentation, hydrothermal extraction and ethanol extraction was applied to Cannabis root. The antioxidant content of cannabis root extracts obtained through a combined processing process was investigated by analyzing the total phenolic, tannin, and flavonoid contents. Anti-inflammatory effects were tested in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells. The anti-inflammatory mechanism was examined by western blot. Finally, the component profile of Cannabis root extract was analyzed using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Thin layer chromatography (TLC).

Results

The cannabis root extract prepared by complex processing process had higher antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects than simple extract. Total phenolic and tannin contents were significantly increased, and DPPH free radical inhibition activity was strengthened by combined processing process. Increased NO production and iNOS expression in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells were decreased in a concentration-dependent manner upon extract treatment by complex processing process. Additionally, the Stigmasterol content of Cannabis root extract was increased through a complex processing process.

Conclusions

Further research is needed on the mechanisms and substances that exhibit the anti-inflammatory effects of Cannabis roots extract prepared by complex processing process.

Fig. 1

Total phenolic content, tannin content, flavonoid content of Cannabis root extract prepared by combined processing process.

Fig. 2

DPPH radical scavenging activity of Cannabis root extract by combined processing process. (A) DPPH radical scavenging effects for various concentration (B) IC50 values of DPPH assay. The values are significantly different at *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.

Fig. 3

Effect of Cannabis root extract by combined processing process on RAW264.7 cell viability. RAW264.7 cells were incubated with different concentration of Cannabis root extract (0–500 μg/ml) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured by EZ-Cytox assay as described in materials and methods. Results are the means ± SDs of three independent experiments.

Fig. 4

Comparison of anti-inflammatory effects of Cannabis root extract prepared by combined processing process. RAW264.7 cells were co-treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) and Cannabis root extracts for 24 h. (A) Inhibitory effect of Cannabis root extract by combined processing process on NO production. (B) The levels of iNOS protein expression in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells were immunoblotted and analyzed. Results are the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. #P<0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. LPS-untreated controls and *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. LPS-treated control.

Fig. 5

Comparison of compound peaks of Cannabis root extracts (A) HPLC analysis of all Cannabis root extracts prepared by different processing process. (B) Bar chart of peak area results for comparison.

Fig. 6

TLC(Thin-layer chromatography) of the different extracts of Cannabis root showing the content of Stigmasterol. Spot ① indicates Stigmasterol, and Spot ② indicates water extract of Cannabis root, and Spot ③ indicates CSR-Nt, and Spot ④ indicates CSR-4SD, and Spot ⑤ indicates CSR-F-Lr, and Spot ⑥ indicates CSR-4SD-F-Lr, respectively.

Table 1

Schematic diagram of the combined processing process and yield of each processed Cannabis root extract.

References

1. Brand EJ, Zhao Z. 2017;Cannabis in Chinese medicine: are some traditional indications referenced in ancient literature related to cannabinoids? Frontiers in pharmacology 8:238535.
2. Rupasinghe HV, Davis A, Kumar SK, Murray B, Zheljazkov VD. 2020;Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa) as an emerging source for value-added functional food ingredients and nutraceuticals. Molecules 25(18):4078. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184078.
3. Pertwee R. 2008;The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids: Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin. British journal of pharmacology 153(2):199–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707617.
4. Jang E, Kim H, Jang S, Lee J, Baeck S, In S, Kim E, Kim Y-u, Han E. 2020;Concentrations of THC, CBD, and CBN in commercial hemp seeds and hempseed oil sold in Korea. Forensic science international 306:110064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110064.
5. Aizpurua-Olaizola O, Soydaner U, Oztürk E, Schibano D, Simsir Y, Navarro P, Etxebarria N, Usobiaga A. 2016;Evolution of the cannabinoid and terpene content during the growth of Cannabis sativa plants from different chemotypes. Journal of natural products 79(2):324–331. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00949.
6. Machado Bergamaschi M, Helena Costa Queiroz R, Waldo Zuardi A, Crippa AS. 2011;Safety and side effects of cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent. Current drug safety 6(4):237–249. https://doi.org/10.2174/157488611798280924.
7. Han K, Lee M-J, Kim H. 2016;Understanding of medical cannabis and its regulations: a suggestion for medical and scientific needs. Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research 16(2):124–132. https://doi.org/10.15429/jkomor.2016.16.2.124.
8. Murakami M, Hirano T. 2012;The molecular mechanisms of chronic inflammation development. Frontiers in immunology 3:37825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00323.
9. Chelombitko M. 2018;Role of reactive oxygen species in inflammation: a minireview. Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin 73:199–202. https://doi.org/10.3103/S009639251804003X.
10. Chatterjee S. Oxidative stress, inflammation, and disease. Oxidative stress and biomaterials Elsevier; 2016. p. 35–58.
11. Anavi S, Tirosh O. 2020;iNOS as a metabolic enzyme under stress conditions. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 146:16–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.10.411.
12. Gabriels K, Hoving S, Gijbels MJ, Pol JF, te Poele JA, Biessen EA, Daemen MJ, Stewart FA, Heeneman S. 2014;Irradiation of existing atherosclerotic lesions increased inflammation by favoring pro-inflammatory macrophages. Radiotherapy and Oncology 110(3):455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.01.006.
13. 이현정 유찬미, 이다경 김종덕, 마승진 . 2019;구증구포 제다공정에 따른 차의 성분 변화와 관 능적 특성. 한국차학회지 25(1):39–48.
14. Nam K-Y, Lee N-R, Moon B-D, Song G-Y, Shin H-S, Choi J-E. 2012;Changes of ginsenosides and color from black ginsengs prepared by steaming-drying cycles. Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science 20(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2012.20.1.027.
15. 김도완 이연진, 민진우 김유진, 노영덕 양덕 춘. 2009;인삼의 구증구포에 의한 산성다당체, 페놀성화합물의 변환 및 항산화능. 동의생리병리 학회지 23(1):121–126.
16. 김진우 하미애, 신용욱 . 2016;흑도라지의 천 식 동물모델에 대한 면역조절효과. J Korean Soc People Plants Environ 19(4):335–344.
17. 김다희 오다래, 백승연 김미리. 2019;숙성 흑 맥문동의 품질특성 및 항산화능. 한국식품저 장유통학회지 26(5):505–512.
18. Lee JR, Kim YW, Byun SH, Kim SC, Park SJ. 2015;Anti-inflammatory effects of the fermentation extracts consisting of soybean, red ginseng and Citrus Unshiu Peel. The Korea journal of herbology 30(5):59–65. https://doi.org/10.6116/kjh.2015.30.5.59.
19. Hur SJ, Lee SY, Kim Y-C, Choi I, Kim G-B. 2014;Effect of fermentation on the antioxidant activity in plant-based foods. Food chemistry 160:346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.112.
20. Gupta S, Abu-Ghannam N. 2012;Probiotic fermentation of plant based products: possibilities and opportunities. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 52(2):183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.499779.
21. Ryz NR, Remillard DJ, Russo EB. 2017;Cannabis roots: a traditional therapy with future potential for treating inflammation and pain. Cannabis and cannabinoid research 2(1):210–216. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2017.0028.
22. Jin H-L, Yu G-R, Kim H, Cho K-H, Kim K-H, Lim D-W. 2023;A Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Mechanism of Improving Glucose Uptake of Cannabis Root and Stem Extracts. Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research 23(2):51–59. https://doi.org/10.15429/jkomor.2023.23.2.51.
23. Elhendawy MA, Wanas AS, Radwan MM, Azzaz NA, Toson ES, ElSohly MA. 2019;Chemical and biological studies of Cannabis sativa roots. Medical cannabis and cannabinoids 1(2):104–111. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495582.
24. Almeida Neto J, Amando Nery D, Simoni Bezerra Lima K, Eduarda Gomes da Cruz Silva M, Cícero de Lima Araújo T, Andrezza Carvalho de Souza N, Hideki Vicente Nishimura R, de Souza Araújo C, Paula de Oliveira A, Roberto Guedes da Silva Almeida J. 2023;Phytochemical characterization of Cannabis sativa L. roots from Northeastern Brazil. Chemistry & Biodiversity 20(3):e202201039. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202201039.
25. Bondet V, Brand-Williams W, Berset C. 1997;Kinetics and mechanisms of antioxidant activity using the DPPH. free radical method. LWT-Food Science and Technology 30(6):609–615.
26. Jung M-H, Yoo J-M, Kang Y-J, Lee HW, Kim SH, Sung SH, Lee Y-J, Choi I, Kim T-J. 2010;Idesolide, an isolate of Idesia polycarpa, inhibits apoptosis through induction of intracellular heat shock protein 70 in C2C12 muscle cells. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 33(6):1063–1066.
27. Jin D, Dai K, Xie Z, Chen J. 2020;Secondary metabolites profiled in cannabis inflorescences, leaves, stem barks, and roots for medicinal purposes. Scientific Reports 10(1):3309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60172-6.
28. Kornpointner C, Martinez AS, Marinovic S, Haselmair-Gosch C, Jamnik P, Schröder K, Löfke C, Halbwirth H. 2021;Chemical composition and antioxidant potential of Cannabis sativa L. roots. Industrial Crops and Products 165:113422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113422.
29. Mariod AA, Fatima AM. 2022;Properties and advantages of food fermentation. African Fermented Food Products-New Trends :31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82902-5_3.
30. Lim D-W, Wang J-H. 2022;Gut microbiome: the interplay of an “invisible organ” with herbal medicine and its derived compounds in chronic metabolic disorders. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(20):13076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013076.
31. Nguyen TT, Nguyen HV. 2020;Effects of fermentation conditions using Lactobacillus plantarum on the charantin, stigmasterol glucoside and β-sitosterol glucoside contents of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L. uice). Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 75:656–658.
32. Cai Y, Luo Q, Sun M, Corke H. 2004;Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life sciences 74(17):2157–2184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047.
33. Gönel A, Akdağ A, Yilmaz MA. 2018;Identification of phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and anti-cancer effects of the extract obtained from the shoots of Ornithogalum narbonense L. Cellular and Molecular Biology 64(1):75–83. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2018.64.1.14.
34. Si W, Li X, Jing B, Chang S, Zheng Y, Chen Z, Zhao G, Zhang D. 2024;Stigmasterol regulates microglial M1/M2 polarization via the TLR4/NF-κ pathway to alleviate neuropathic pain. Phytotherapy Research 38(1):265–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.8039.
35. Ward MG, Li G, Barbosa-Lorenzi VC, Hao M. 2017;Stigmasterol prevents glucolipotoxicity induced defects in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Scientific reports 7(1):9536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10209-0.
36. Feng S, Dai Z, Liu AB, Huang J, Narsipur N, Guo G, Kong B, Reuhl K, Lu W, Luo Z. 2018;Intake of stigmasterol and β-sitosterol alters lipid metabolism and alleviates NAFLD in mice fed a high-fat western-style diet. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1863(10):1274–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.08.004.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Total phenolic content, tannin content, flavonoid content of Cannabis root extract prepared by combined processing process.

Fig. 2

DPPH radical scavenging activity of Cannabis root extract by combined processing process. (A) DPPH radical scavenging effects for various concentration (B) IC50 values of DPPH assay. The values are significantly different at *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.

Fig. 3

Effect of Cannabis root extract by combined processing process on RAW264.7 cell viability. RAW264.7 cells were incubated with different concentration of Cannabis root extract (0–500 μg/ml) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured by EZ-Cytox assay as described in materials and methods. Results are the means ± SDs of three independent experiments.

Fig. 4

Comparison of anti-inflammatory effects of Cannabis root extract prepared by combined processing process. RAW264.7 cells were co-treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) and Cannabis root extracts for 24 h. (A) Inhibitory effect of Cannabis root extract by combined processing process on NO production. (B) The levels of iNOS protein expression in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells were immunoblotted and analyzed. Results are the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. #P<0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. LPS-untreated controls and *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. LPS-treated control.

Fig. 5

Comparison of compound peaks of Cannabis root extracts (A) HPLC analysis of all Cannabis root extracts prepared by different processing process. (B) Bar chart of peak area results for comparison.

Fig. 6

TLC(Thin-layer chromatography) of the different extracts of Cannabis root showing the content of Stigmasterol. Spot ① indicates Stigmasterol, and Spot ② indicates water extract of Cannabis root, and Spot ③ indicates CSR-Nt, and Spot ④ indicates CSR-4SD, and Spot ⑤ indicates CSR-F-Lr, and Spot ⑥ indicates CSR-4SD-F-Lr, respectively.

Table 1

Schematic diagram of the combined processing process and yield of each processed Cannabis root extract.

Table 1