Study of Korean medicine`s Education In Accordance With Curriculum Part of World Federation Medical Educaition Global Standards

Article information

J Korean Med. 2018;39(3):28-40

Publication date (electronic) : 2018 September 30

doi : https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.18022

Jeong Hyeok Lee ¹

, Byoung Soo Kim ¹

¹Department of Physiology, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University

Correspondence to：김병수(Byoung Soo Kim) 대전대학교 한의과대학 생리학교실 Tel: +82-42-280-2616, E-mail: kbsoo25@dju.kr

Received 2018 August 27; Revised 2018 September 11; Accepted 2018 September 11.

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to introduce the WFME Global Standards and Recognition process and to consider Improvement direction of Korean traditional medical curriculum.

Methods

To Investigate the Standards and Recognition process of WFME and the traditional medical curriculum of each country(China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea).

Results

The WFME Global Standards and Recognition process aims to train doctors who are educated and active in world standard medical Curriculum. The traditional medical colleges have not received recognition, but those colleges in Korea, China and Taiwan contain a lot of standards contents, and they need to be recognized if they belong to WDMS.

Conclusions

Korea University of Oriental Medicine has a lot of subjects of WFME Standards and there is a medical education recognition association, which is advantageous for the standardization process of world medical education. Therefore, it is necessary to aim at world standard medicine while preserving the tradition of Oriental medicine, WFME Global Standards should be used to reorganize the curriculum and train a world-class medical professional.

Keywords: WFME; Global Standards; Korean Medicine Education; Medical Education; Curriculum

Fig. 1

Chinese and Taiwan medical education system including chinese medicine

Table 1

Accepting Types for Traditional Medicine17)18)

References

1. Ministry of Health & Welfare and Related departments. Third comprehensive plan for the development of Korean medicine Seajong: Ministry of Health & Welfare. departments; 2016. p. 42–46. p. 97–103.

2. World Federation For Medical Education. Basic Medical Education WFME Global Standards For Quality Improvement The 2015 Revision Copenhagen: WFME; 2015. p. 1–71.

3. World Federation For Medical Education. About WFME - leaflet” Published by World Federal Medical Education Ferney-Voltaire Copenhagen: WFME; 2017. p. 1–2.

4. Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation. ASK 2019(Accreditation Standards Of KIMEE 2019) Seoul: KIMEE; 2019. p. 19.

5. Working Committee for the Accreditation of Medical Education, MOE, China. Accreditation Standards for Basic Medical Education in China - The 2016 Revision Beijing: MOE China; 2016. p. 10–14.

6. Moon OR, Kim EY, Shin EY, Kim HY, Cheon HR. A comparative Study on the Combined Oriental and Western Medicine(COWM) in Four Northeast Countries. Korean journal of health policy and administration 2003;13(2):1–22.

7. Yoon GJ, Kim DS. Medical Unification Plan’ for shared growth with modern medicine and traditional medicine in Korea Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Affairs; 2013. p. 52–53. p. 80.

8. Lee EK, Song AJ, Jeong MS. Review on Prevetive Treatment Disease Program promoted in China. Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine 2014;18(2):47–58.

9. Yoon GJ, Kim DS, Kwon SH, Ahn BR, Kang AR, Yang GH. Current Situation of the Relationship between Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine in China & Taiwan and Implications: Focusing on Human Resource Development and Protection. Seoul:Korean Institute for International Economic Policy & Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs 2016;121:124.

10. Choi BR, Chao YJ, Son CG. Study on the State of Kampo Medical Services in Japan. The Journal of Korean Oriental Internal Medicine 2014;Jul. 35(3):309–316.

11. EBM Special Committee of the Japanese Oriental Medical Association. Evidence-based oriental prescriptions Seoul: KoonJa; 2011. p. 148.

12. World Diretory of Medical Schools. Available at: URL:https://www.wdoms.org/ .

13. World Federal Medical Education - Global Standards Available at: URL:http://wfme.org/standards/ .

14. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. Available at: URL:http://iec.shutcm.edu.cn .

15. Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Available at: URL:http://www.shutcm.edu.cn .

16. Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine. Available at: URL:http://www.gzhtcm.edu.cn .

17. Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Available at: URL:http://news13.tjutcm.edu.cn .

18. Taiwan Medical Accreditation Council. Available at: URL:http://www.heeact.edu.tw/mp.asp?mp=3 .

19. Oriental Medical College of Kyunghee University. Available at: URL:http://kmc.khu.ac.kr/html_2016/02/01_02.php .

20. Sang Huang Ryong. China Acupuncture Academic history Outline. Seoul: Beopin; 2007. p. 214–426.

21. Seon Roh Seok. Primary color ophthalmology and otolaryngology Seoul: Seoul Printing Company; 2012. p. 416p. 433p. 485–92.

22. Rakel Robert E, Rakel David. Textbook of Family Medicine 9th Editionth ed. New york: Elsevier; 2015. p. 315.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Chinese and Taiwan medical education system including chinese medicine

Table 1

Accepting Types for Traditional Medicine17)18)

유형	특징
통합형	- 전통의학과 서양의학 통합
통합형	- 국가가 정책적으로 전통의학과 서양의학의 결합 지지

내포형	- 공식적으로 전통의학을 인정하여 서양의학과 병존
내포형	- 완전히 이원화된 의료서비스 제공체계
병존형	- 이중면허는 허용되나, 의료행위 시에는 하나만 선택

용인형	- 의술로는 전통의학이 수용되나 국가제도로는 비수용
용인형	- 일원화된 의료체계로서 전통의학은 서양의학의 한 부분

배제형 독점형	- 전통의학의 불인정