Study about Analysis of Current Case for Oriental Medical Disputes:

With a Focus on the Oriental Medical Injury Relief Data from Korea Consumer Agency

Article information

J Korean Med. 2015;36(3):111-125
1Department of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital
2Pusan National University School of Korean Medicine
Correspondence to: 천진홍(Jin-hong Cheon), 경남 양산시 물금읍 금오로 20 부산대학교 한의학전문대학원, Tel: +82-55-360-5942, Fax: +82-55-360-5942, E-mail: cheonjh@pusan.ac.kr
Received 2015 August 14; Revised 2015 September 25; Accepted 2015 September 30.

Abstract

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to analyze the current cases of oriental medical injury relief data from Korea Consumer Agency (KCA), and to report the current change of oriental medical disputes pattern.

Methods:

Oriental medical injury relief cases processed by KCA from January 2010 to February 2015 were collected and analyzed.

Results:

149 Oriental medical injury relief cases from KCA were analyzed for the study. The highest number that had been relieved was 43 in 2014. In monthly status, 18 case in September was The highest. According to the record, the bigger city had the bigger amount of relief cases which was 53(Seoul), 43(Gyeng-gi), 11(Busan) and so on. In age categories, 30s had the highest number of injury relief cases. The injury relief cases of package program had been rapidly increasing since 2013. Cancellation was the dominant claims cause of package program and consumer required the refund of prepayment. Breast augmentation was the majority treatment type of injury relief cases of package program. Average prepayment of package program was ₩3,166,085.

Conclusions:

This study finded that the major cause of oriental medical dispute was changed from side effect of clinical treatment to patient’s satisfaction of medical service.

Fig. 1.

Annual Status of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA

Fig. 2.

Monthly Status of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA

Status of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA According to Area Categories

Status of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA According to Age Categories and Treatment Type

Annual Status Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA According to Treatment Method

Process Result According to Treatment Method and Reason of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases

Treatment Type of Program and Average Prepayment

References

1. Min HY, Sohn MS, Kim KK. A Rational Scheme for Medical Malpractice Compensation in OBGYN : Focusing on a Structural Analysis by Types. Korean Journal of Medicine and Law 2004;12(2):63–100.
2. Jeong MY. Research on the Rational Solution for Oriental Medical Conflicts: Focusing on the relieving role of KCA in oriental medical disputes. Medicine and Law 2008;9(2):383–422.
3. Kim JY. Medical dispute and law ed. 1th ed. Seoul: Yulgokbook publishing; 2006. p. 38.
4. LIG Insurance Co. White paper to see the oriental medical dispute cases Sejong Claims Adjusting & Surveying Co., Ltd; 2012.
5. Lee ES, Oh JH, Cho HS, Kim KH, Lee SD, Kim KS, et al. Study about the Status and Prevention of Oriental Medical Disputes. J Korean Med 2014;35(1):58–67.
6. Lee HW, Kim H. Medical Dispute and the Proper Guideline for Medical Practice in Korean Medicine. Korean J. Oriental Physiology & Pathology 2006;20(6):1749–62.
7. Kim SC. Alternative Resolving Medical Malpractice Disputes on the Consumer Protection Laws Korean Medical Association; 2003. p. 44–53.
8. The Judicial Yearbook National Court Administration of S. KOREA; 2013. p. 731–2.
9. Korea Consumer Agency Consumer’s damage cases year and case book 2007 Koran Consumer Agency; 2008. p. 524.
10. Korea Consumer Agency Consumer’s damage cases year and case book 2014 Koran Consumer Agency; 2015. p. 293.
11. Jeong YY. An Inducement problem on the principle liability without fault in a legislative bill of injury and relief in a medical accident. Medicine and Law 2006;7(2):271–310.
12. Lee W, Kim SY, Lee MJ. Application of malpractice cause analysis tools for preventing repeat medical accident. Korean Journal of Medicine and Law 2014;22(1):21–42.
13. Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Statistical Yearbook 2014 Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency; 2015. p. 46–101.
14. Shin HS, Kim MY, Kim SM, Ahn ES, Cho HA. Report on the current state of dental accidents and malpractice prevention and patient safety Health Policy Institute; 2014. p. 84–8. p. 157.
15. Korea Consumer Agency Consumer’s damage cases year and case book 2012 Korea medical dispute mediation and arbitration agency; 2013. p. 20.
16. Lee HG, Shin EH. Survey of medical dispute on the plastic surgery Korean Consumer Agency; 2007. p. 105–38.
17. Lee JC, Min HY, Kim KH, Kim HN. Factors Associated with the Malpractice Settlement Cost between Doctors and Patients in Korea. Health and Social Science 2010;28:171–96.
18. Kim GR. On Alternative Dispute Resolution Of Medical Disputes:With a focus on the analysis of practical cases of medical injury relief by Korea Consumer Agency in Department of Law, KOREA univ; 2012. p. 183.
19. Park SJ, Kim YM. Bundling strategy for new high-teck product : the role of price discount framing, brand image, and product innovativeness. the Journal of Marketing Management Research 2011;16(1):63–87.
20. Kwak JS, Shin BC. The Influence of Product Knowledge on Effectiveness of Price-off Versus Value-Added Promotion in Selling Product Bundles. Journal of commodity science and technology 2008;26(3):25–38.
21. Jeon HH. Legal issue of dental medical dispute. The Journal of The Korean Dental Association 2001;39(9):759–63.
22. Cha YR, Kwon JS, Choi JH, Kim CY. The Analysis of the Current Status of Medical Accidents and Disputes Researched in the Korean Web Sites. Korean Journal of Oral Medicine 2006;31(4):297–316.
23. Kim MK, Cho HA, Lee JH. Domestic and Foreign literature review of Dental Accidents and Malpractice claims. The Journal of The Korean Dental Association 2015;53(2):82–95.
24. Seidberg BH. Dental litigation: triad of concerns, in Legal medicine Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007. p. 499–506.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Annual Status of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA

Fig. 2.

Monthly Status of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA

Table 1.

Status of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA According to Area Categories

capital area Gyeongsang Jeolla Chungcheong Gang won Jeju
Seoul Gyeonggi Incheon Gyeong buk Gyeong nam Busan Daegu Ulsan Jeon buk Jeon nam Gwangju Chungbuk Chung nam Daejeon total
53 (35.6) 43 (28.9) 9 (6.0) 2 (1.3) 3 (2.0) 11 (7.4) 7 (4.7) 3 (2.0) 2 (1.3) 1 (0.7) 4 (2.7) 1 (0.7) 8 (5.4) 0 (0) 1 (0.7%) 1 (0.7%) 149
105(70.5%) 26(17.4%) 7(4.7%) 9(6.0%)

Table 2.

Status of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA According to Age Categories and Treatment Type

Age Categories Under 10 10 – 19 20 – 29 30 – 39 40 – 49 50 – 59 60 – 69 70 – 79 More than 80 Total
Package Program 1 1 17 15 11 3 1 1 - 50
Acupuncture - - 2 4 8 13 3 2 2 34
Herbal - 3 1 12 1 3 1 1 - 22
Misdiagnosis - - 1 4 - 5 - 2 - 12
Total Care - - 2 1 - 4 3 1 - 11
Chuna - - - 2 2 1 1 - - 6
Ointment 2 2 - 1 - - - - - 5
Admission - - - - - - 1 2 - 3
Moxibustion - - - - 1 1 - - - 2
Hot Pack - - - - - 2 - - - 2
Etc - - 2 - - - - - - 2
Total 3 (2.0%) 6 (4.0%) 25 (16.8%) 39 (26.2%) 23 (15.4%) 32 (21.5%) 10 (6.7%) 9 (6.0%) 2 (1.3%) 149

Table 3.

Annual Status Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases in KCA According to Treatment Method

Annual status 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Package Program 3 4 2 11 27 3 50
Acupuncture 7 12 5 4 6 - 34
Herbal 2 4 5 3 6 2 22
Misdiagnosis 4 3 3 - 2 - 12
Total Care - 3 5 3 - - 11
Chuna 1 3 - - 2 - 6
Ointment 2 2 1 - - - 5
Admission 1 1 - 1 - - 3
Moxibustion - 2 - - - - 2
Hot Pack - 2 - - - - 2
Etc - - - 2 - - 2
Total 20 36 21 24 43 5 149

Table 4.

Process Result According to Treatment Method and Reason of Oriental Medical Injury Relief Cases

Rrequest mediation Compensation Refund linfonnation offering Withdrawal Advisement In progress Impossibility Total
Program 17 5 23 1 1 2 1 - 50
  Cancellation 4 1 20 1 - - - - 26
  Unsatisfaction 12 4 3 - 1 2 - - 22
  Exacerbation 1 - - - - - 1 - 2
Acupuncture 13 11 - 7 3 - - - 34
  Inflammation 7 4 - 5 1 - - - 17
  Etc 2 3 - - 1 - - - 6
  nerve injury 2 2 - 1 1 - - - 6
  Exacerbation 1 1 - 1 - - - - 3
  Unsatisfaction - 1 - - - - - - 1
  Pigmentation 1 - - - - - - - 1
Herbal 4 6 7 5 - - - - 22
  Hebal side effect 1 2 3 2 - - - - 8
  Toxic Hepatitis 2 3 I 1 - - - - 7
  Exacerbation 1 1 3 1 - - - - 6
  Unsatisfaction - - - 1 - - - - 1
Misdiagnosis 1 5 1 2 1 1 - 1 12
  Delayed Diagnosis 1 5 1 2 1 1 - 1 12
Total Care 3 4 1 1 1 1 - - 11
  Unsatisfaction 2 2 1 - - 1 - - 6
  Exacerbation 1 2 - 1 1 - - - 5
Chuna 1 2 - 3 - - - - 6
  Disk herniation 1 2 - 2 - - - - 5
  Exacerbation - - - 1 - - - - 1
Ointment - 1 - 4 - - - - 5
  Pigmentation - - - 2 - - - - 2
  Inflammation - - - 2 - - - - 2
  Exacerbation - 1 - - - - - - 1
Admission 2 1 - - - - - - 3
  Exacerbation 2 - - - - - - - 2
  Etc - 1 - - - - - - 1
Moxibustion 1 1 - - - - - - 2
  Burn 1 1 - - - - - - 2
Hoi pack 1 - - 1 - - - - 2
  Bum 1 - - 1 - - - - 2
Etc - - 1 1 - - - - 2
  Etc - - - 1 - - - - 1
  Cancellation - - 1 - - - - - 1
    Total 43 36 33 25 6 4 1 1 149

Table 5.

Treatment Type of Program and Average Prepayment

Type of program Prepayment
Breast Augmentation 19 3,367,647
Facial lifting 7 1,471,429
Obesity program 3 1,490,000
Skin regeneration 3 3,945,000
Hair loss treatment 3 2,049,633
Corrective pelvic 2 1,059,000
Chuna 2 2,161,500
Anticancer 1 3,500,000
Genu varum 1 1,000,000
Tic disorder 1 10,800,000
Mental counseling 1 19,500,000
Detoxification 1 1,640,000
Beauty treatment 1 2,300,000
Torticollis treatment 1 8,000,000
Growth treatment 1 2,600,000
Qi treatment 1 2,000,000
Temporomandibular 1 1,800,000
Sputum accumulation 1 -
50 3,166,085