Home | Register | Login | Inquiries | Alerts | Sitemap |  


Advanced Search
JKM > Volume 47(1); 2026 > Article
Park and Lee: Patterns of Traditional Korean Medicine and Western Medicine Utilization Among Women with Menopausal Disorders: A 9-Year Nationwide Cohort Study Using National Health Insurance Data

Abstract

Background

Menopausal disorders impose significant socioeconomic burdens worldwide, with declining hormone replacement therapy (HRT) usage following safety concerns from the Women’s Health Initiative study. This has increased interest in traditional Korean medicine (TKM) and integrative approaches for menopausal symptom management.

Objective

To analyze real-world treatment patterns and healthcare utilization among women with menopausal disorders, comparing TKM monotherapy with combined TKM-Western medicine approaches using nationwide health insurance claims data.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 9 years (2015–2023) of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service data for 71,381 women diagnosed with menopausal disorders. Patients were categorized into TKM monotherapy and combined TKM-Western medicine groups. Treatment patterns, medication usage, and clinical characteristics were compared between groups.

Results

HRT usage rates maintained 15–18% levels with recent decline. The combined therapy group showed significantly higher treatment duration (707.8 vs. 55.3 days), visits (15.5 vs. 5.7), and HRT usage (78.6% vs. 6.2%) compared to TKM monotherapy. Comorbidity prevalence was higher in the combined group: depression (17.7% vs. 11.1%), sleep disorders (22.6% vs. 16.1%), and osteoporosis (17.3% vs. 13.6%). Acupuncture was used in 90.9% of TKM patients, predominantly in combination with cupping (71.9%) and thermal therapy (61.6%). The most common combination was acupuncture+cupping+thermal therapy (26.8%). Western medicine prescriptions were dominated by analgesic-antipyretics (73.4%), gastrointestinal medications (71.3%), and psychotropic drugs (30.9%).

Conclusions

This study revealed distinct healthcare utilization patterns between treatment groups, suggesting that combined therapy patients represent a more complex, treatment-refractory population requiring long-term, multifaceted care. TKM monotherapy patients showed preference for non-pharmacological treatments with shorter treatment durations. These findings support the need for personalized, integrated treatment strategies based on patient characteristics and symptom complexity. Future research should evaluate clinical outcomes and establish evidence-based guidelines for integrative menopausal care within healthcare systems.

Fig. 1
Healthcare utilization trends and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) usage patterns from 2015 to 2023. (A) Overall healthcare utilization showing total visits (blue line, left y-axis) and unique patients (green line, right y-axis). (B) HRT usage patterns displaying the absolute number of HRT users (red line, left y-axis) and HRT user rate as a percentage of unique patients (purple line, right y-axis). The shaded area indicates the COVID-19 pandemic period (2020–2021), which coincided with notable decreases in healthcare utilization. Data represent annual aggregated values from electronic health records.
jkm-47-1-152f1.gif
Table 1
Baseline Characteristics of Women With Menopausal Disorders by Type of Medical Use
Variable KM Only1 (N=56130) KM+WM1 (N=15251) Total (N=71381) p-value
Demographics
Age (mean ± SD) 52.4 ± 5.3 51.9 ± 4.4 52.3 ± 5.1 <0.001

Age group <0.001
 - ≤39 224 (0.4%) 31 (0.2%) 255 (0.4%)
 - 40–49 15828 (28.2%) 4322 (28.3%) 20150 (28.2%)
 - 50–59 35077 (62.5%) 10107 (66.3%) 45184 (63.3%)
 - ≥60 5001 (8.9%) 791 (5.2%) 5792 (8.1%)

Medication & Visits
 HRT use: No 52650 (93.8%) 3266 (21.4%) 55916 (78.3%) <0.001
 HRT use: Yes 3480 (6.2%) 11985 (78.6%) 15465 (21.7%) <0.001
 Follow-up duration (days)2 55.3 ± 141.6 707.8 ± 764.7 194.7 ± 460.7 <0.001
 Number of visits3 5.7 ± 11.6 15.5 ± 18.1 7.8 ± 13.8 <0.001

Comorbidities
 Depression 6203 (11.1%) 2706 (17.7%) 8909 (12.5%) <0.001
 Diabetes mellitus 7897 (14.1%) 2238 (14.7%) 10135 (14.2%) 0.059
 Hyperlipidemia 22592 (40.2%) 6765 (44.4%) 29357 (41.1%) <0.001
 Hypertension 10712 (19.1%) 2669 (17.5%) 13381 (18.7%) <0.001
 Musculoskeletal symptoms 45716 (81.4%) 13082 (85.8%) 58798 (82.4%) <0.001
 Osteoporosis 7640 (13.6%) 2640 (17.3%) 10280 (14.4%) <0.001
 Sleep disorder 9016 (16.1%) 3441 (22.6%) 12457 (17.5%) <0.001

1 KM: Korean Medicine; WM: Western Medicine. “KM only� refers to patients who received Korean medicine treatment only. “KM+WM� indicates patients who received both Korean and Western medicine during episode.

2 Follow-up duration is defined as the number of days between the first and last Menopausal Disorders-related visit.

3 Number of visits includes all outpatient claims with Menopausal Disorders during the episode period.

Table 2
Most Frequently Prescribed Western Medications for Women With Menopausal Disorders (N=71,381)
Treatment category Total Prescriptions Unique Patients Prescribed Percent of Total Patients (%) Percent of All Prescriptions (%) Avg. Prescriptions per Patient
Estrogen and progestin therapy 106,426 11,397 15.97% 58.57% 9.34
Urogenital tract medications 15,090 4,803 6.73% 8.30% 3.14
Calcium supplements 9,968 1,756 2.46% 5.49% 5.68
Antipyretic, analgesic, NSAIDs 5,296 1,944 2.72% 2.91% 2.72
Anti-ulcer agents 4,842 1,906 2.67% 2.66% 2.54
Other digestive system agents 4,308 1,870 2.62% 2.37% 2.30
Broad-spectrum antibiotics 3,500 1,532 2.15% 1.93% 2.28
Other chemotherapeutic agents 2,596 1,380 1.93% 1.43% 1.88
Antihistamines 2,530 1,150 1.61% 1.39% 2.20
Psychotropic agents 2,213 725 1.02% 1.22% 3.05
Anthelmintics 2,106 1,265 1.77% 1.16% 1.66
Anti-arteriosclerotic agents 1,702 384 0.54% 0.94% 4.43

This table summarizes prescription patterns among 71,381 patients with Menopausal Disorders with Western medicine. “Total Prescriptions� refers to the total number of prescriptions issued for each drug category; “Unique Patients Prescribed� indicates the number of patients who received at least one prescription in that category; “Percent of Total Patients� represents the proportion of these patients relative to the total cohort; “Percent of All Prescriptions� refers to the share of prescriptions by drug category; and “Avg. Prescriptions per Patient� is calculated by dividing total prescriptions by the number of patients prescribed.

Table 3
Frequently Prescribed Western Medicine Therapeutic Classes During the Menopausal Period Among Women Diagnosed With Menopausal Disorders (N=71,381)
Treatment combination Total Treatments Unique Patients Treated Percent of Total Patients (%) Percent of All Treatments (%) Avg. Treatments per Patient
Antipyretics, analgesics, NSAIDs 621,474 52,376 73.38% 14.30% 11.87
Anti-ulcer agents 511,879 50,926 71.34% 11.78% 10.05
Antitussives and expectorants 288,135 33,980 47.60% 6.63% 8.48
Other digestive system agents 287,318 40,993 57.43% 6.61% 7.01
Psychotropic agents 237,362 22,073 30.92% 5.46% 10.75
Antihistamines 216,188 35,530 49.78% 4.98% 6.08
Adrenal hormones 181,574 32,813 45.97% 4.18% 5.53
Broad-spectrum antibiotics 169,973 33,791 47.34% 3.91% 5.03
Ophthalmic preparations 140,958 23,930 33.52% 3.24% 5.89
Estrogen and progestin therapy 134,060 15,475 21.68% 3.09% 8.66
Enzyme preparations 96,748 25,757 36.08% 2.23% 3.76
Local anesthetics 80,883 16,871 23.64% 1.86% 4.79
Table 4
Utilization of Korean Medicine Therapies Among Women With Menopausal Disorders (N=65,430)
Treatment group Total treatments Number of unique patients Percentage of total patients (%) Percentage within group (%) Percentage by treatment combination (%) Average treatments per patient
Acupuncture 990,856 64,857 90.86 99.12 46.76 15.28
Cupping 650,946 51,306 71.88 78.41 30.72 12.69
Hot and cold meridian therapy 458,851 43,976 61.61 67.21 21.66 10.43
Chuna 18,194 3,552 4.98 5.43 0.86 5.12
Table 5
Top 10 Most Frequently Prescribed Reimbursed Herbal Medicines (Multi-herb Formulas and Single-herb Preparations) for Menopausal Women in Korean Medicine (N=19,964)
Herbal formula Total treatments Number of unique patients Percentage of total patients (%) Percentage within herbal group (%) Average treatments per patient
GamisoYosan 23,603 8,040 11.26 40.27 2.94
OjeokSan 8,352 2,127 2.98 10.65 3.93
HyangsapyungwiSan 5,791 2,251 3.15 11.28 2.57
PyungwiSan 4,988 1,628 2.28 8.15 3.06
HwangryeonhaedokTang 4,382 1,291 1.81 6.47 3.39
GungHwaTang 4,308 773 1.08 3.87 5.57
BanhasasimTang 4,259 1,676 2.35 8.40 2.54
JaeumganghwaTang 4,241 1,370 1.92 6.86 3.10
Jakyak 3,122 773 1.08 3.87 4.04
IjinTang 3,096 739 1.04 3.70 4.19

This table includes reimbursed herbal medicine products, encompassing both multi-herb formulas and single-herb preparations (e.g., Jakyak). Non-reimbursed decoctions were not included.

Table 6
Top 10 Most Common Treatment Combinations for Menopausal Disorders in Korean Medicine (N=71,381)
Combination type Total treatments Number of unique patients Percentage of total patients (%) Percentage by combination (%) Average treatments per patient
Acupuncture + Cupping + Hot and cold meridian therapy 196,562 19,129 26.80 26.38 10.28
Acupuncture + Cupping 174,722 17,354 24.31 23.45 10.07
Acupuncture 143,878 12,629 17.69 19.31 11.39
Western Medicine 96,561 9,662 13.54 12.96 9.99
Acupuncture + Hot and cold meridian therapy 60,250 7,852 11.00 8.09 7.67
Acupuncture + Cupping + Hot and cold meridian therapy + Korean Medicine 20,370 4,686 6.56 2.73 4.35
Acupuncture + Cupping + Korean Medicine 13,618 3,055 4.28 1.83 4.46
Korean Medicine 7,726 2,252 3.15 1.04 3.43
Acupuncture + Chuna + Cupping + Hot and cold meridian therapy 7,647 1,504 2.11 1.03 5.08
Acupuncture + Korean Medicine 5,629 1,594 2.23 0.76 3.53

참고문헌

1. Fang, Y., Liu, F., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Liu, Y., & Yang, L., et al (2024). Mapping global prevalence of menopausal symptoms among middle-aged women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1767. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19280-5
crossref pmid pmc pdf

2. Ryu, K.-J., Park, H., Kim, Y. J., Yi, K. W., Shin, J. H., & Hur, J. Y., et al (2020). Comparison of various menopausal symptoms and risk factor analysis in Korean women according to stage of menopause. Maturitas, 140, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.023
crossref pmid

3. Sarrel, P., Portman, D., Lefebvre, P., Lafeuille, M.-H., Grittner, A. M., & Fortier, J., et al (2015). Incremental direct and indirect costs of untreated vasomotor symptoms. Menopause, 22(3), 260.
crossref pmid

4. Shiozawa, A., Mancuso, S., Young, C., Friderici, J., Tran, S., & Trenz, H. M. (2024). Comparison of Healthcare Costs for Women with Treated Versus Untreated Vasomotor Symptoms Due to Menopause. Advances in Therapy, 41(5), 1885-1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-02821-0
crossref pmid pmc pdf

5. Crawford, S. L., Crandall, C. J., Derby, C. A., Khoudary, S. R. E., Waetjen, L. E., & Fischer, M., et al (2019). Menopausal hormone therapy trends before versus after 2002: Impact of the Women’s Health Initiative Study Results. Menopause, 26(6), 588. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001282
crossref

6. Yang, L., & Toriola, A. T. (2024). Menopausal Hormone Therapy Use Among Postmenopausal Women. JAMA Health Forum, 5(9), e243128. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3128
crossref pmid pmc

7. Kingsberg, S., Banks, V., Caetano, C., Janssenswillen, C., Moeller, C., & Schoof, N., et al (2024). Real-world evaluation of treatment utilization by women experiencing vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause in the United States and Europe: Findings from the REALISE study. Maturitas, 189, 108096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108096
crossref pmid

8. Dong-Il, Kim. (2005). World Research Trends in Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) for Postmenopausal Women and Traditional Korean Medicine (TKM) Research Group’s Response. Journal of Korean Medicine, 26(2),


9. Lee, I.-S., Kim, J. W., Jeon, S.-H., Kang, C.-W., Chi, G. Y., & Lee, Y. T., et al (2019). Reliability and validity of a pattern identification diagnostic tool for climacteric and postmenopausal syndrome pattern identification: A clinical study of a newly developed questionnaire. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 32, 100986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2019.100986
crossref

10. Li, H., Yeung, T. C., Zhang, C., Meng, W., Miao, J. X., & Zhong, L. L. (2023). Evidence-based Chinese medicine clinical practice guideline on menopausal syndrome in Hong Kong. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 57, 102213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2022.102213
crossref

11. Kim, S., Oh, H.-K., Kim, J.-Y., Hong, J.-W., & Cho, S.-I. (2011). A review of pharmacological effects of Angelica gigas, Angelica sinensis, Angelica acutiloba and their bioactive compounds. The Journal of Korean Medicine, 32(4), 1-24.


12. Chiu, H.-Y., Pan, C.-H., Shyu, Y.-K., Han, B.-C., & Tsai, P.-S. (2015). Effects of acupuncture on menopause-related symptoms and quality of life in women in natural menopause: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 22(2), 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000260
pmid

13. Kwon, C.-Y., Lee, B., & Lee, J.-Y. (2024). Effectiveness and safety of East Asian herbal medicine for menopausal insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15, 1414700. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1414700
crossref pmid pmc

14. Lee, H. W., Choi, T.-Y., Lee, M. S., Lee, J. A., Jun, J. H., & Choi, J., et al (2021). Prescription patterns of herbal medicine for menopausal disorders in major Korean medicine hospitals: A multicenter retrospective study. Integrative Medicine Research, 10(3), 100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100706
crossref pmid

15. Tsai, Y.-T., Lai, J.-N., Wu, C.-T., & Lin, S.-K. (2014). Concurrent Use in Taiwan of Chinese Herbal Medicine Therapies among Hormone Users Aged 55 Years to 79 Years and Its Association with Breast Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2014(1), 683570. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/683570
crossref pmid pmc pdf

16. Park, C. Y., Lim, J.-Y., Kim, W.-H., Kim, S. Y., & Park, H.-Y. (2021). Evaluation of menopausal hormone therapy use in Korea (2002–2013): A nationwide cohort study. Maturitas, 146, 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.02.003
crossref pmid

17. Chun, S., Jung, K., Hong, B., Shin, J.-Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2025). Treatment patterns of menopausal hormone therapy in South Korea: A nationwide cohort study. Climacteric, 28(6), 733-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2025.2524165
crossref pmid

18. Ebrahimi, A., Tayebi, N., Fatemeh, A., & Akbarzadeh, M. (2020). Investigation of the role of herbal medicine, acupressure, and acupuncture in the menopausal symptoms: An evidence-based systematic review study. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(6), 2638. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1094_19
crossref pmid pmc

19. Alsugeir, D., Adesuyan, M., Talaulikar, V., Wei, L., Whittlesea, C., & Brauer, R. (2024). Common mental health diagnoses arising from or coinciding with menopausal transition and prescribing of SSRIs/SNRIs medications and other psychotropic medications. Journal of Affective Disorders, 364, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.036
crossref pmid

20. Jia, Y., Zhou, Z., Xiang, F., Hu, W., & Cao, X. (2024). Global prevalence of depression in menopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 358, 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.051
crossref pmid

21. Lyu, Y. R., Kim, K.-I., Yang, C., Jung, S.-Y., Kwon, O. J., & Jung, H.-J., et al (2022). Efficacy and Safety of Ojeok-San Plus Saengmaek-San for Gastroesophageal Reflux-Induced Chronic Cough: A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13, 787860. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.787860
crossref pmid pmc

22. Kim, J.-B., Shin, J.-W., Kang, J.-Y., Son, C.-G., Kang, W., & Lee, H.-W., et al (2014). A traditional herbal formula, Hyangsa-Pyeongwi san (HPS), improves quality of life (QoL) of the patient with functional dyspepsia (FD): Randomized double-blinded controlled trial. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 151(1), 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2013.10.033
crossref pmid

23. Park, M., Lee, Y. J., & Shin, S.Analysis of the utilization of traditional medicine in Korea over 10 years 2013–2022: A repeated cross- sectional study using national health insurance data. Plos one, 20(4), e0321517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321517
crossref

24. Jun, J. H., Lee, H. W., Choi, J., Choi, T.-Y., Lee, J. A., & Go, H.-Y., et al (2019). Perceptions of using herbal medicines for managing menopausal symptoms: A web-based survey of Korean medicine doctors. Integrative Medicine Research, 8(4), 229-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2019.08.004
crossref pmid pmc

25. Lee, H. W., Jun, J. H., Choi, J., Choi, T.-Y., Lee, J. A., & Ang, L., et al (2020). Herbal prescription for managing menopausal disorders: A practice survey in Korean medicine doctors. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 38, 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.101073
crossref pmid

Editorial office contact information
3F, #26-27 Gayang-dong, Gangseo-gu Seoul, 157-200 Seoul, Korea
The Society of Korean Medicine
Tel : +82-2-2658-3627   Fax : +82-2-2658-3631   E-mail : skom1953@skom.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Developed in M2PI