Health in adolescent is very important in the whole life. But, students in Korea are very busy and hard to care about their health. This study is aimed to effectiveness and safety of effectiveness of School Doctor program in Korean Medicine.
Method
From august to december, 2015, Korean medicine association in Sungnam city conducted school doctor program for 12 middle and 8 high school. School doctor visitied 8 times and treat, lecture and consulting for students and teachers. The number of students participating in health lecture is 1,905. The number of students participating in the school project was 147 students in junior high school and 187 students in high school, totaling 334 students.
Results
The overall satisfaction rate of students was very high (83.2%) for school doctor program in Korean medicine. 92.8% of respondents answered that they should continue to school doctor program in Korean medicine.
Conclusions
We find that Korean medicine is suitable for the school doctor program. But this study have some limitations. Large-scale prospective study will be needed.
a,b means statistically different by Bonferri analysis
Table 4
The Satisfaction of School Doctor Program in Korean Medicine
Variables
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Not bad
Good
Very Good
P-value
Age
13 (N=28)
0(0)
1(3.6)
3(10.7)
8(28.6)
16(57.1)
0.683
14 (N=55)
0(0)
2(3.6)
7(12.7)
26(47.3)
20(36.4)
15 (N=64)
0(0)
1(1.6)
13(20.3)
20(31.3)
30(46.9)
16 (N=59)
0(0)
3(5.1)
6(10.2)
18(30.5)
32(54.2)
17 (N=98)
0(0)
2(2.0)
14(14.3)
39(39.8)
43(43.9)
18 (N=30)
0(0)
0(0.0)
4(13.3)
11(36.7)
15(50.0)
School
M.S. (N=147)
0(0)
4(2.7)
23(15.6)
54(36.7)
66(44.9)
0.885
H.S. (N=187)
0(0)
5(2.7)
24(12.8)
68(36.4)
90(48.1)
Gender
Male (N=78)
0(0)
0(0.0)
12(15.4)
29(37.2)
37(47.4)
0.409
Female (N=256)
0(0)
9(3.5)
35(13.7)
93(36.3)
119(46.5)
Total
0(0)
9(2.7)
47(14.1)
122(36.5)
156(46.7)
M.S. Middle school, H.S. High school
Table 5
Need for School Doctor Program in Korean Medicine
Variables
No need
Need
P-value
Age
13(N=28)
1(3.6)
27(96.4)
0.940
14(N=55)
4(7.3)
51(92.7)
15(N=64)
4(6.3)
60(93.8)
16(N=59)
4(6.8)
55(93.2)
17(N=98)
9(9.2)
89(90.8)
18(N=30)
2(6.7)
28(93.3)
School
Middle school(N=147)
9(6.1)
138(93.9)
0.505
High school(N=187)
15(8.0)
172(92.0)
Gender
Male(N=78)
8(10.3)
70(89.7)
0.230
Female(N=256)
16( 6.3)
240(93.8)
Total
24( 7.2)
310(92.8)
Table 6
The Satisfaction of Health Consultation School Doctor in Korean Medicine
Variables
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Not bad
Good
Very Good
P-value
Age
13 (N=28)
0(0)
1(3.6)
4(14.3)
8(28.6)
15(53.6)
0.614
14 (N=55)
0(0)
0(0.0)
14(25.5)
19(34.5)
22(40.0)
15 (N=64)
0(0)
0(0.0)
15(23.4)
28(43.8)
21(32.8)
16 (N=59)
0(0)
2(3.4)
9(15.3)
21(35.6)
27(45.8)
17 (N=98)
0(0)
2(2.0)
15(15.3)
42(42.9)
39(39.8)
18 (N=30)
0(0)
0(0.0)
5(16.7)
11(36.7)
14(46.7)
School
M.S. (N=147)
0(0)
1(0.7)
33(22.4)
55(37.4)
58(39.5)
0.305
H.S. (N=187)
0(0)
4(2.1)
29(15.5)
74(39.6)
80(42.8)
Gender
Male (N=78)
0(0)
0(0.0)
20(25.6)
23(29.5)
35(44.9)
0.079
Female (N=256)
0(0)
5(2.0)
42(16.4)
106(41.4)
103(40.2)
Total
0(0)
5(1.5)
62(18.6)
129(38.6)
138(41.3)
M.S. Middle school, H.S. High school
Table 7
The Satisfaction of Therapy & Treatment School Doctor Program in Korean Medicine
Variables
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Not bad
Good
Very Good
P-value
Age
13 (N=28)
0(0.0)
0(0.0)
4(14.3)
9(32.1)
15(53.6)
0.745
14 (N=55)
0(0.0)
1(1.8)
10(18.2)
18(32.7)
26(47.3)
15 (N=64)
0(0.0)
0(0.0)
16(25.0)
21(32.8)
27(42.2)
16 (N=59)
0(0.0)
2(3.4)
12(20.3)
21(35.6)
24(40.7)
17 (N=98)
1(1.0)
4(4.1)
20(20.4)
38(38.8)
35(35.7)
18 (N=30)
0(0.0)
2(6.7)
2(6.7)
14(46.7)
12(40.0)
School
M.S. (N=147)
0(0.0)
1(0.7)
30(20.4)
48(32.7)
68(46.3)
0.124
H.S. (N=187)
1(0.5)
8(4.3)
34(18.2)
73(39.0)
71(38.0)
Gender
Male (N=78)
0(0.0)
3(3.8)
11(14.1)
28(35.9)
36(46.2)
0.614
Female (N=256)
1(0.4)
6(2.3)
53(20.7)
93(36.3)
103(40.2)
Total
1(0.3)
9(2.7)
64(19.2)
121(36.2)
139(41.6)
M.S. Middle school, H.S. High school
Table 8
The Satisfaction of Therapy School Doctor Program in Korean Medicine
Variables
Very unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Not bad
Good
Very Good
P-value
Age
13 (N=28)
0(0.0)
1(3.6)
6(21.4)
9(32.1)
12(42.9)
0.943
14 (N=55)
0(0.0)
0(0.0)
14(25.5)
20(36.4)
21(38.2)
15 (N=64)
1(1.6)
2(3.1)
14(21.9)
26(40.6)
21(32.8)
16 (N=59)
0(0.0)
2(3.4)
14(23.7)
18(30.5)
25(42.4)
17 (N=98)
0(0.0)
3(3.1)
26(26.5)
37(37.8)
7(23.3)
18 (N=30)
0(0.0)
1(3.3)
9(30.0)
7(23.3)
13(43.3)
School
M.S. (N=147)
1(0.7)
3(2.0)
34(23.1)
55(37.4)
54(36.7)
0.656
H.S. (N=187)
0(0.0)
6(3.2)
49(26.2)
62(33.2)
70(37.4)
Gender
Male (N=78)
0(0.0)
1(1.3)
23(29.5)
25(32.1)
29(37.2)
0.700
Female (N=256)
1(0.4)
8(3.1)
60(23.4)
92(35.9)
95(37.1)
Total
0(0)
5(1.5)
62(18.6)
129(38.6)
138(41.3)
M.S. Middle school, H.S. High school
Table 9
Advantage for School Doctor Program in Korean Medicine
Male (N=78)
Female (N=256)
M.S. (N=147)
H.S. (N=187)
Awareness of my condition
35
132
74
93
Therapy for symptoms
41
103
75
69
Get health information
26
104
51
79
Knowing for health management
21
115
68
68
Table 10
No Preferred Reasons for Korean Medical Clinic
Male (N=78)
Female (N=256)
M.S. (N=147)
H.S. (N=187)
Preference for western medicine
27
101
56
72
Dislike for Korean therapy (Ex. Acupuncture, Moxa)
9
56
33
32
Not well konwoing for Korean medicine
10
45
23
32
No time for therapy
28
94
54
68
참고문헌
1. Chavasse M, North D, & McAvoy B. Adolescent health--a descriptive study of a school doctor clinic. N Z Med J;(1995). 108(1003):271-3.
2. Oberklaid F. Role of the school doctor. Br J Hosp Med;(1993). 49(11):765-6.
3. Jarvis SN, Waterston A, Halse P, Paynter A, Jones P, & Colver A. The extended role of the new school doctor. Arch Dis Child;(1990). 65(5):559
4. Enforcement Decree of School Health Act. Available at: URL: http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%ED%95%99%EA%B5%90%EB%B3%B4%EA%B1%B4%EB%B2%95%20%EC%8B%9C%ED%96%89%EB%A0%B9
5. Kim JN, & Hong KE. J of Kor Acup & Moxi;(2007). 24(5):219-28.
6. Kim CH, An JM, Kim SH, Seol JS, Kim HJ, & Park JH. An analysis of effects on vision care program including traditional Korean treatment for elementary school students. J Korean Oriental Med;(2011). 32(2):92-101.
7. Choi SP, Eun YJ, Song YK, & Lim HH. A study on effect of obesity management program for elementary school student. J Kor Oriental Association for study of obesity;(2005). 5(1):109-119.
8. Kim SW, Jung YS, Chu KO, Kim GW, Kim SH, & Koo BS. The effects of Jajun-maum-dom-movement program on the attention and hyperactivity of middle school students. J of Oriental Neuropsychiatry;(2010). 21(4):79-97.
9. Kim DG, Park WH, & Cha YY. Effect of Kyungohkgo on aerobic capacity and anti-fatigue in high school soccer players. Korean J Oriental Physiology & Pathology;(2011). 25(5):934-44.
10. Song IG, & Cho HJ. Korean Medicine Clinical Effects on Atopic Dermatitis of 12 Children in Farm Village - Effects of Korean Medicine Clinical Therapy of Liver for Atopic Dermatitis. Journal of Korean Medical classics;(2014). 27(3):141-54.
11. Jung SH, Kim GR, Jeong JS, Sung HK, Lee JA, & Kang SH, et al. A study for usage patterns and recognition toward Korean medicine in Korea high school students. J Society of Preventive Korean medicine;(2016). 20(1):19-28.