Home | Register | Login | Inquiries | Alerts | Sitemap |  


Advanced Search
JKM > Volume 34(3); 2013 > Article
Kim, Kim, Park, and Ryu: Availability of Diagnosis of Yin-deficiency in Elderly People with Xerostomia and Factors Influencing Subjective Oral Dryness: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Objectives:

The aims of this study were to investigate the availability of diagnosis of Yin-deficiency in the elderly with xerostomia and factors influencing subjective oral dryness.

Methods:

We surveyed 50 patients recruited by the clinical trial, ‘Efficacy of Yukmijihwang-tang on Xerostomia in the Elderly: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Two-center Trial’. The subjects were assessed on their subjective oral dryness using the Dry Mouth Symptom Questionnaire (DMSQ). Their salivary functions were measured by Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR) measurements. In addition, the subjects were evaluated on their Qi-stagnation and Yin-deficiency conditions using the Qi-stagnation questionnaire and Yin-deficiency questionnaire.

Results:

There were statistically significant correlations between three variables (USFR, DMSQ score and Qi-stagnation score) and Yin-deficiency score. In the multiple regression analysis, the regression model was statistically significant (F = 10.273, p < .001). The factor most strongly influencing the subjective oral dryness was USFR (ß = −0.386). Yin-deficiency had the next strongest impact on the subjective oral dryness (ß = 0.371). Qi-stagnation affected the subjective oral dryness weakly (ß = 0.075). In the simple regression analysis, Yin-deficiency had a statistically significant effect on each of six subscales of DMSQ (p < .01). Among the six subscales, DMSQ-1 (‘Oral dryness at night or on awakening’) was the most strongly influenced by Yin-deficiency.

Conclusions:

The results of this study show that the diagnosis of Yin-deficiency in the elderly with xerostomia was available and Yin-deficiency was an important factor influencing the subjective oral dryness. Therefore, the consideration of Yin-deficiency is significant for diagnosis and treatment in the elderly with xerostomia.

Table 1.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
1) Aged between 60 and 80years
2) VAS scores greater than 4
3) The unstimulated salivary flow rate should be under 0.3mL/min
4) Patients complaining of xerostomia within the previous 3 months
5) Patients able to read, write, hear, or see
6) Patients able to agree that they will not receive xerostomia-related treatments for 3 months after initiation of the study
7) Patients able to sign a written informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria
1) A history of treatments for autoimmune diseases like Sjögren’s syndrome, rheumatism, or lupus
2) A history of craniocervical radiation therapy, organ transplantation
3) A history of severe psychiatric illness, or major depression
4) The use of any other herbal prescriptions or nutritional supplements before 2 weeks form participation
5) The use of xerostomia-relieving medications (pilocarpine and cevimeline) or therapies for xerostomia (mouthwash, gum, and toothpaste for xerostomia)
Table 2.
USFR, DMSQ score, Yin-deficiency score and Qi-stagnation score Related to General Characteristics table
Gender Age

Male Female p 60–69 70–79 p
N(%) 20(40) 30(60) 28(56) 22(44)
USFR 0.15 ± 0.10 0.14 ± 0.08 0.797 0.14 ± 0.09 0.15 ± 0.08 0.637
DMSQ 333.50 ± 164.40 311.33 ± 140.42 0.612 334.36 ± 151.46 302.18 ± 147.86 0.455
Yin-deficiency score 400.35 ± 146.51 272.23 ± 153.96 0.005* 317.39 ± 177.50 331.23 ± 144.62 0.224
Qi-stagnation score 33.35 ± 15.78 31.50 ± 15.92 0.688 29.82 ± 17.08 35.32 ± 13.58 0.768

P-value is calculated by independent t-test.

* Statistically significant difference (p < .05)

The values of USFR, DMSQ, Yin-deficiency score and Qi-stagnation score were expressed as Mean ± Standard Deviation.

N(%): Number of subjects

† USFR: Unstimulated salivary flow rater

‡ DMSQ: Dry mouth symptom questionnaire

Table 3.
Correlation Between Three Variables (USFR, DMSQ score and Qi-stagnation score) and Yin-deficiency score
Yin-deficiency score
r p
USFR −0.278 0.043*
DMSQ score 0.519 < .001*
Qi-stagnation score 0.500 < .001*

P-value is calculated by Pearson’s correlation.

r: Pearson’s correlation coefficient

* Statistically significant correlation

† USFR: Unstimulated salivary flow rate

‡ DMSQ: Dry mouth symptom questionnaire

Table 4.
Multiple Regression Analysis for DMSQ score
Independent Variables B S.E. ß t p VIF
USFR −668.762 210.163 −0.386 −3.182 0.003 1.133
Qi-stagnation score 0.710 1.275 0.075 0.557 0.580 1.386
Yin-deficiency score 0.340 0.129 0.371 2.642 0.011 1.511

R2 0.401
F-value 10.273
P-value < .001*

F-value and P-value are calculated by multiple regression analysis.

* Statistically significant

† DMSQ: Dry mouth symptom questionnaire

‡ USFR: Unstimulated salivary flow rate

B: Unstandardized coefficients

S.E.: Standard error

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn18-jkm-34-3-13-2'] } ß: Standardized coefficients

t: t-statistic

VIF: Variance inflation factor

Table 5.
Comparison of Simple Regession Models of Yin-deficiency Score on Each Subcale of DMSQ
Subcale of DMSQ B S.E. ß t R2 P-value F-value
DMSQ-1 0.079 0.019 0.509 4.094 0.259 < .001* 16.757
DMSQ-2 0.079 0.022 0.463 3.620 0.214 0.001* 13.103
DMSQ-3 0.076 0.027 0.382 2.867 0.146 0.006* 8.222
DMSQ-4 0.084 0.027 0.404 3.058 0.163 0.004* 9.352
DMSQ-5 0.076 0.025 0.406 3.082 0.165 0.003* 9.500
DMSQ-6 0.083 0.021 0.498 3.975 0.248 < .001* 15.801

P-value and F-value are calculated by simple regression analysis.

* Statistically significant

† DMSQ: Dry mouth symptom questionnaire

B: Unstandardized coefficients

S.E.: Standard error

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn26-jkm-34-3-13-2'] } ß: Standardized coefficients

t: t-statistic

References

1. Park MS, Ryu SA. Degree of Dry Mouth and Factors Influencing Oral Health-related Quality of Life for Community-Dwelling Elders. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010; 40:5. 747–55.
crossref pmid

2. Ship JA. Diagnosing, managing, and preventing salivary gland disorders. Oral Dis. 2002; 8:2. 77–89.
crossref pmid

3. Fox PC, van der Ven PF, Sonies BC, Weiffenbach JM, Baum BJ. Xerostomia: evaluation of a symptom with increasing significance. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985; 110:4. 519–25.
pmid

4. Atkinson JC, Wu A. Salivary gland dysfunction: causes, symptoms, treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994; 125:409–16.
pmid

5. Guggenheimer J, Moore PA. Xerostomia: etiology, recognition and treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134:1. 61–9.
pmid

6. Oh JK, Kim YJ, Kho HS. A Study on the Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Dry Mouth. Korean Academy of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine. 2002; 26:4. 331–43.


7. Hopcraft MS, Tan C. Xerostomia: an update for clinicians. Aust Dent J. 2010; 55:3. 238–44.
crossref pmid

8. Cohen-Brown G, Ship JA. Diagnosis and treatment of salivary gland disorders. Quintessence Int. 2004; 35:108–23.
pmid

9. Fox PC. Management of dry mouth. Dental Clinics of North America. 1997; 41:863–75.
pmid

10. Lowman RM, Cheng GK. Diagnostic Roentgenology. In disease of the salivary glands. 1980. W.B. Saunders Co;p. 54–98.


11. Navazesh M, Christensen CM. A comparison of whole mouth resting and stimulated salivary measurement procedures. J Dent Res. 1982; 61:10. 1158–62.
crossref pmid

12. Wang SL, Zhao ZT, Li J, Zhu XZ, Dong H, Zhang YG. Investigation of the clinical value of total saliva flow rates. Arch Oral Biol. 1998; 43:39–43.
crossref pmid

13. Spielman A, Ben-Aryeh H, Gutman D, Szargel R, Deutsch E. Xerostomia diagnosis and treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981; 51:2. 144–7.
crossref pmid

14. Screebny LM. Xerostomia (Dry mouth). In the salivary system. Screebny LM, editor. Boca Raton. 1988. CRC Press, Inc.;p. 179–202.


15. Chae BY. Donguianibiinhugwahak. Seoul: Jipmoondang;2011. 444:p. 461–2.


16. Lee SJ, Park JB, Lee SS, Kim KH. Development of Yin-Deficiency Questionnaire and Examine the Reliability and Validity. Korean J Oriental Physiology & Pathology. 2004; 18:2. 376–80.


17. Lee JY, Lee YO, Kho HS. Reliability of a Questionnaire for Evaluation of Dry Mouth Symptoms. Korean Journal of Oral Medicine. 2005; 30:4. 383–9.


18. Navazesh M, Christensen CM. A comparison of whole mouth resting and stimulated salivary measurement procedures. J Dent Res. 1982; 61:10. 1158–62.
crossref pmid

19. Derasawa Gasseutosi. Seoyanguihakjaui Hanbangjillyohak . Seoul: Jipmoondang;1998. p. 41–58.
pmid pmc

20. Cassolato SF, Turnbull RS. Xerostomia: clinical aspects and treatment. Gerodontology. 2003; 20:2. 64–77.
crossref pmid

21. Ikebe K, Matsuda K, Morii K, Wada M, Hazeyama T, Nokubi T. Impact of dry mouth and hyposalivation on oral health-related quality of life of elderly Japanese. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 1:216–22.
crossref pmid

22. Jang JH, Kim SH. The Relationship between Xerostomia and Depression in Elderly People. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion. 2007; 24:3. 51–60.


23. Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J. Low unstimulated salivary flow and subjective oral dryness: association with medication, anxiety, depression, and stress. J Dent Res. 2000; 79:9. 1652–8.
crossref pmid

24. Locker D. Subjective reports of oral dryness in an older adult populations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993; 21:3. 165–8.
crossref pmid

25. Han GJ, Kim JS, Seon JK, Son JH, Oh SW, Park YS, et al. Correlation between Xerostomia, Stress and Qi Movement Stagnation in Halitosis Patients. Korean J Orient Int Med. 2010; 31:3. 488–99.


26. Hoe Jun. Donguibogam. Seoul: Namsandang;2004. 81:p. 339


27. Choi SM, Yang KS, Choi SH, Park KM, Park JH, Shim BS, et al. Standardization and unification of the terms and conditions used for diagnosis in oriental medicine III. Korean J Ori Med. 1997; 3:1. 41–65.


28. ÖOsterberg T, Landahl S, Hedegåard B. Salivary flow, saliva pH, buffering capacity in 70-year-old men and women. Correlation to dental health, dryness in the mouth, disease and drug treatment. J Oral Rehabil. 1984; 11:157–70.
crossref pmid

TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
PubReader  PubReader
Download Citation  Download Citation
  E-Mail
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
3
Crossref
2,631
View
17
Download
Editorial office contact information
3F, #26-27 Gayang-dong, Gangseo-gu Seoul, 157-200 Seoul, Korea
The Society of Korean Medicine
Tel : +82-2-2658-3614   Fax : +82-2-2658-3631   E-mail : skom1953@daum.net
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
powerd by m2community